![]() |
DisputingDate: 2015-10-07; view: 548. Analyzing Comparing Clarifying To be more exact It should not be confused with It seems appropriate to make several remarks about We must be strict in laying down that To throw a light on the problem To make the point quite clear, let us consider that When giving we always add To avoid ambiguity, it should be better to
When comparing , we see that to have smth in common Comparing , we observe that It is usual to perceive similarity between Comparing , we may conclude that If we compare , we can safely assume that It usually runs smth like These views are bound to be unequal, because Pointing out both resemblances and discrepancies, we must admit Two widely divergent views of show that It will be best seen by comparing and
As can be seen from It logically follows that Here we have sought to show that From what was said about it follows that A more detailed analysis invariably shows that In discussing we will try to define to require modification to be accordingly designated by It is plain that not to be taken to absolutely Analysing we seek to clarify
The problem of is one that causes great controversies One of the disputable points is that It is disproved by the fact that to be bluntly formulated It would be a gross error to suppose that Some doubt has been expressed about It is against this background that to be one of the most vexed problems to be quite rightly combated to be rather far from the truth It may be argued that
|